Let's take 15 year old kids to court for kissing!

The Today programme had an item about new laws designed to safeguard children from sexual predators. Apparently they also criminalise two 15 year olds for having a kiss! What really got me was that the Home Office Minister, Paul Goggins, was saying that they couldn’t work out how to phrase it so that this wasn’t possible. I mean come on! What kind of excuse it that? He was going on about having to define what kinds of “sexual acts” would be covered… are our legislators this blinkered? How about going along the lines of if there is age difference of less than 2 years, then any wrong doing isn’t covered using the sexual predator stuff and we let existing laws cover it?

Mr Goggins’ rather poor comment that the police have promised that they won’t use the law against teenagers is equally stupid. We already know that when you give the police powers they will use them. Take the case of the demonstrators at the arms fair who were searched without any reason… Besides, if the law isn’t going to be used against teenagers like that, then phrase it such that it can’t be!

It just annoys me that we can’t even get a relatively simple law to protect children without cocking it up because we can’t think of the right way to word it.

RIAA Goes After Children

The Register is reporting that the RIAA is suing a 12 year old girl for downloading music. What really gets me is that the RIAA president Cary Sherman said: “Nobody likes playing the heavy and having to resort to litigation”.

Who are they kidding?

If they charged a sensible price for CDs and sold MP3s themselves at sensible prices (say 50p per song) then they would be raking it in… oh wait.. they are raking it in anyway! I have very little sympathy with an industry that hasn’t cut the prices of CDs since their introduction 20 years or so ago…

Time to start looking at independant artists I think. Anyone give me some good recommendations?

Reliability

Neil is currently writing an interesting series on software development. This section comes from today’s piece on reliability of software.

“Programmers, like all people, are fairly lazy. For any sufficiently complex problem, a programmer will implement the basic part well enough, but will frequently leave a segment for implementing later. If you look though the code of an application, you will no doubt find comments marked up with initials, a few asterisks or an X or three. These are the sections the programmers decided to leave for later, possibly hoping that when later came, it would be someone else working on it.”

It’s so true!

Productivity

This is turning into a really productive day today. I’m not sure why, but I’ve managed to tick off 5 items on a list of 7 things to be done by Wednesday. It’s very satisfying and I was getting comfortable with the idea of making the deadline…

The dangers of complacency.

Just now, I’ve been given two more jobs to be done by tomorrow night which means that 5 out of 7 might be all they get for Wednesday. Typical!

Whinge

We went to Merry Hill shopping centre this morning/lunchtime. Mainly to have a look around. It’s very nice and not very far away (half an hour’s drive). Jon didn’t cope very well with not having a lunchtime nap though and has been whinging all afternoon :(

Dead Laptop

The laptop we use to connect to the Internet has died :( There’s a nasty clicking sound when the harddrive is accessed and it doesn’t work any more… We’ve now set it up so that we connect via Georgina’s PC until we decide what to do about having a third PC available whilst we play games :)